نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه اقتصاد، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

4 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، ایران

چکیده

فضای کسب‌وکار در گسترش و تسهیل فعالیت­های اقتصادی هر کشور نقش تأثیرگذاری داشته و بهبود فضای کسب‌وکار جزو مهم‌ترین اولویت­های سیاست‌گذاران اقتصادی و سیاسی کشورها تلقی می­گردد. یکی از متغیرهای مهم تأثیرگذار بر فضای کسب‌وکار، فساد است. فساد می‌تواند در قالب رشوه، ملاحظات جناحی و سیاسی در انجام کسب‌وکارها، اخذ اعتبارات بانکی و مواردی از این قبیل بر فضای کسب‌وکار تأثیرگذار باشد؛ ازاین‌رو در این پژوهش، عوامل مؤثر بر فضای کسب‌وکار با تأکید بر فساد در کشورهای منتخب اسلامی در بازه زمانی 2018-2005 مطالعه شده است. برای این کار داده‌ها و اطلاعات لازم برای برآورد مدل از پایگاه اطلاعاتی بانک جهانی و سازمان بین‌المللی شفافیت استخراج شده و مدل تحقیق با روش رگرسیونی کوانتایل برآورد شده است. نتایج برآورد مدل نشان می‌دهد که بالا بودن سطح فساد تأثیر منفی بر سهولت کسب‌وکار کشورها داشته و فضای کسب‌وکار در این کشورها را بدتر می‌کند. نرخ بیکاری و نرخ تورم نیز به‌عنوان شاخص‌های بی‌ثباتی اقتصادی تأثیر منفی بر فضای کسب‌وکار دارند؛ اما در سطح معناداری 5 درصد، تأثیر نرخ بیکاری تنها در کوانتیل­های اول، دوم و سوم به لحاظ آماری معنادار است. همچنین درآمد مالیاتی، باز بودن تجاری کشور و نوسانات نرخ ارز به‌ترتیب تأثیر منفی، مثبت و منفی بر فضای کسب‌وکار داشته و این اثرات در سطح معناداری 5 درصد به لحاظ آماری معنادار هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Impact of Corruption on Ease of Doing Business (Evidence from Iran and selected Islamic countries)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Siamak ShokouhiFard 1
  • Roya Aleemran 2
  • Farzad Rahimzadeh 3
  • AmirAli Farhang 4

1 Department of Economics, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of Economics, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Economic and Accounting, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Payame Noor University, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
Expended Abstract:
Introduction
The business environment is one of the determinants of any country's economic status and based on it, each country's economic conditions can be studied and analyzed. The more transparent and competitive business environment, the better economic health, adoption of favorable policies, and improvement of economic indicators.
In other words, the effect of a favorable business environment on increasing the attraction of domestic and foreign investment, job creation, and growth of GDP is quite evident (Mehrabani et al., 2016).
In an economy, several factors affect the business environment. One of the most important of these factors is corruption. Numerous studies on corruption show that corruption can be detrimental to an economy. The extent of the destructive effects of corruption depends on the degree and level of the national economic development. Corruption initially hinders and reduces economic growth by reducing the incentive to invest. It then prevents growth from growing by restructuring government spending. Corruption in various ways undermines economic growth. This social dilemma prevents expanding the market mechanism by deviating from the allocation of resources and incentives. It also leads to the weakening of property rights and the non-guarantee of benefits arising from the provisions of contracts and to the detriment of small businesses (Tanzi, 1998).
 Theoretical frame work
Theoretically, there is a significant relationship between the negative consequences of corruption and bribery and ease of doing business. In most newly industrialized countries, such as India, Brazil, and the Philippines, it has been observed that the good quality of business rules and regulations has led to the growth of such activities and possibly encouraged foreign direct investment. The road has acted in favor of the economy at the macro-level (Sung, 2013).
Methodology
Considering the situation of Iran and selected Islamic countries in terms of the business environment and because improving the business environment has been one of the most important challenges and goals of macroeconomic plans in Iran in recent decades, therefore in this research, the effective factors on the business environment studied for 2005 to 2018 with emphasis on the corruption in the selected Islamic countries. To do this, the data was extracted from the World Bank's database and the International Organization for Transparency, and the research model was estimated using the quantile regression method.
In this study, the corruption variable was measured by the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index, and the World Bank Business Index measured the business variable.
 
Results and Discussion
The results show that a high level of corruption hurts the ease of doing business in countries and worsens the business environment. Unemployment and inflation rates as indicators of economic instability have a negative impact on the business environment, But at the 5% significance level, the effect of the unemployment rate is only statistically significant in the first, second, and third quintiles. Also, tax revenue, trade openness, and exchange rate volatility have negative, positive, and negative effects on the business environment. These effects are statistically significant at a 5 percent level of significance.
 
Conclusions and Suggestions
Considering the negative impact of corruption on the business environment, it is suggested that by implementing policies such as e-government development, reducing government size, improving the culture and level of public morality by promoting condemnation of corruption and bribery, preventing government influence in regulatory and inspection bodies, eliminate Excessive guidelines and regulations that increase the potential for abuse and corruption, reform of organizational culture, expand the free flow of information and encourage people to report corruption, stabilize business laws, enforce preventive laws and regulations, and tackle economic corruption seriously and decisively. The level of corruption in the country is controlled and as a result, by controlling (reducing) corruption, the business environment becomes favorable.
According to the research results, inflation and unemployment as two indicators of macroeconomic instability have a negative impact on business in Iran and selected Islamic countries. Therefore, the Central Bank must control the country's liquidity and inflation by implementing monetary policies commensurate with its economic situation. The government should also improve the business environment by implementing appropriate employment policies and increasing the country's employment level.
Given the negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the country's business environment, the central bank, and the government, to create confidence in the foreign exchange market and prevent exchange rate fluctuations, should implement exchange rate policies appropriate to economic and sanctions conditions and minimize exchange rate fluctuations.
Given the positive impact of countries' trade openness on the business environment, the adoption of appropriate policies in the field of trade liberalization to take advantage of trade opportunities and capital in the global economy and the development of exports of services and goods and thus improve the business environment is proposed by the government.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Business
  • Corruption
  • Quantile regression
  • Iran
 
[1]       Ades, A., & Di Tella, R. (1999). Rents, competition, and corruption. American Economic Review, 89(4), 982-993.
[2]       Amarandei, C. M. (2013). Corruption and foreign direct investment: evidence from central and eastern European states, Journal of CES working Paper, 5(3), 311-322.
[3]       Avnimelech, G., & Zelekha, Y. (2011). The Effect of Corruption on Entrepreneurship, Paper presented at the DRUID 2011, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, and June 15-17, 2011.
[4]       Bonga, Wellington G., & Mahuni, K. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Ease of Doing Business and Corruption on Economic Growth for Africa Free Trade Zone (AFTZ) Member States, MPRA Paper No. 88932. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88932/.
[5]       Chan, K. S., Dang, Q. T., & Tingting, L. (2019). The evolution of corruption and development in transitional economies: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.001.
[6]       Cooray, A., & Dzhumashev, R. (2018). The effect of corruption on labour market outcomes. Economic Modelling, 74(C), 207-218.
[7]       Cooray, A., & Schneider, F. (2016). Does corruption promote emigration? An empirical. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1), 293- 310.
[8]       Dutta, N., Kar, S., & Roy, S. (2013). Corruption and persistent informality: an empirical investigation for India, Journal of International review of Economica & Finance, 27(c), 357-373.
[9]       Emerson, P. M. (2006). Corruption, competition and democracy. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), 193-212.
[11]   Karimi takanlou, Z., Sadeghi, s.k., & Satari, M. (2014). Studying the factors affecting business environment in Iran. Economic Journal, 14 (1, 2), 5- 26 (In persian).
[12]    Koenker, R., & Machado, A.F. (1999), Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1296-1310.
[13]   Koenker. R., & Bassett, G. (1982). Tests of Linear Hypotheses and L1 Estimation, Econometrica, 50, 83–1577.
[14]   Maruichi, D., & Abe, M. (2019). Corruption and the business environment in Vietnam: Implications from an empirical study, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 6(2), 222-245.
[15]   Majles Research Center. (2017). Using popular capacities to combat and prevent corruption (examining the experiences of selected countries). Office of Economic Studies (In persian).
[16]   Mehrabani, F., Abdollahi, F., & Basirat, M. (2016). Considering the Effects of Doing Business on Economic Growth for Iran, MENA and OECD Countries by GMM Method. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 4(13), 65-96 (In persian).
[17]   Newey, W. K. & Powell, J. L. (1987). Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55(4), 819-847.
[18]   Ntouko, C. N . (2013). Regulatory framework and private investment: empirical evidenc  for developing countris, Journal of Economics Bulletin, 33(1), 494-510.
[19]   Schmidt, D. E., & Prytula, Y. (2018). Business corruption in Ukraine: A way to get things done?. Business Horizons,  61 (6),  867-879.
[20]   Sivula, I. (2015). what drives corruption and how corruption impacts business formation? A case study of Ukraine in a prospect of cross-country analysis, Master’s Thesis, Prof. Mark Schelker, ass. Simon Berset Chair of Public Finance, University of Fribourg.
[21]   Sung, H. E. (2013). Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(2), 179-193.
[22]   Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures, International Monetary fund, 45 (4), 559-594.
[23]   Theobald, R. (1990). Corruption, Development and Underdevelopment, Durham: Duke University Press.
[24]   Tian, F., Gao, J., & Yang, K. (2016). A Quantile Regression Approach to Panel Data Analysis of Health Care Expenditure in OECD Countries, Monash Bussiness school, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, working paper, 1- 27.
[25]   Trentini, C., & Koparanova, M. (2013). Corruption and entrepreneurship: does gender matter?, ECE, Discussion Paper No. 2013-1.
[26]   Transparency International. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index. http://www. transparency.org/cpi2014/results.
[27]   Transparency International. (2019). Corruption Perceptions Index. http://www. transparency.org/cpi2014/results.
[28]   Valibeighi, H., & Panahi, F. (2010). Iran's position in the world economy compared to selected countries (in terms of human development indicators, economic freedom and business environment). Journal of Business Reviews, 8 (43), 27- 42 (In persian).
[29]   World Bank, Doing Business Reports (2005-2019).
[30]   World Bank, Doing Business. (2019). Iran, Islamic Rep, IFC & IM.