Impact of Good Governance on Economic Freedom in MENA Countries

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• Abolfazl Shahabadi ¹
• Mahsa. Ganji ²

¹ Bu-Ali Sina University- Hamedan

² Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/erd.v22i9.50926

Abstract

One strategy for economic development is Achieve desired economic freedom. Several factors have an impact on the economic freedom index, Therefore, it seems achieve to favorable economic freedom depends on an accurate understanding of the determinants and factors affecting economic freedom. The index published in economic freedom of the world measures the degree to which the policies and institutions of countries are supportive of economic freedom. The cornerstones of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to compete, and security of privately owned property. Forty-two variables are used to construct a summary index and to measure the degree of economic freedom in five broad areas: Size of government; legal system and property rights, sound money, freedom to trade internationally, regulation. The cornerstones of economic freedom are (1) personal choice, (2) voluntary exchange coordinated by markets, (3) freedom to enter and compete in markets, and (4) protection of persons and their property from aggression by others. Economic freedom is present when individuals are permitted to choose for themselves and engage in voluntary transactions as long as they do not harm the person or property of others. While individuals have a right to their own time, talents, and resources, they do not have a right to those of others. Thus, individuals do not have a right to take things from others or demand that others provide things for them. The use of violence, theft, fraud, and physical invasions are not permissible in an economically free society, but otherwise, individuals are free to choose, trade, and cooperate with others, and compete as they see fit. To a large degree, the EFW measure is an effort to identify how closely the institutions and policies of a country correspond with the ideal of a limited government, where the government protects property rights and arranges for the provision of a limited set of “public goods” such as national defense and access to money of sound value, but little beyond these core functions. In order to receive a high EFW rating, a country must provide secure protection of privately owned property, even-handed enforcement of contracts, and a stable monetary environment. It also must keep taxes low, refrain from creating barriers to both domestic and international trade, and rely more fully on markets rather than government spending and regulation to allocate goods and resources. In many ways, a country’s EFW summary rating is a measure of how closely its institutions and policies compare with the idealized structure implied by standard textbook analysis of microeconomics. Improvement in Economic Freedom closely related to institutional indicators performance such as Good Governance index. So the aim of this study is an analysis of the Economic Freedom index and examines the impact of good governance on economic freedom index in MENA countries over the period 1996-2010 using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Theoretical frame work
The EFW’s annual reports emphasize the fact that the world’s richest countries are also its most liberal ones. This relationship is presented as a reason for encouraging developing countries to liberalize. The basic idea underlying this prescription is that poor countries can become wealthy by emulating rich ones, a contestable proposition that has been criticized by many scholars. Conceptually, economic freedom covers a wide range of economic indicators, so obviously many factors are involved to improve or weaken the index of economic freedom. Index of economic freedom is not only influenced their components, but on the other hand, strongly influenced by other institutional components as good governance index. Improving good governance index affects economic environment through various means such as political stability, increase government efficiency, curb inflation. Improving good governance indicators also will improve the economic freedom index as regulation, legal structure, property rights and market regulation recovery.
Methodology
In this study we have used factor analysis method. The purpose of exploratory factor analysis is to reduce a larger set of variables into a smaller range of factors denoting common underlying concepts. With complete-linkage hierarchical cluster analysis, MENA countries are divided into the same category in accordance with farthest euclidian (L2) distances between groups. Factor Analysis, includes exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis is approach to reduce variables and identify the factors that are not empirically. Confirmatory factor analysis confirms or denies grouping data.
Results & Discussion
The analysis shows that economic freedom index is heavily influenced by the good governance index to the extent that legal system and property rights index is one of the indicators of economic freedom, is more closely associated with the good governance. A wide range of legal system and property rights index is defined by good governance indicators. The relationship between economic freedom index and the index of good governance is also confirmed.
Conclusions & Suggestions
Economic freedom and good governance are strongly connected. This means that indicators of good governance to pave the way to improve the economic freedom index. So the policy recommendations for policy makers that systematic review of institutional indicators is essential to improve economic outcomes. Good governance should considering as a prerequisite for improving other macroeconomic indicators. Resolve conflict and rectify the institutional indicators like economic freedom and good governance approved in developing countries.

Keywords: Economic Freedom, Good Governance, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, MENA Region

JEL Classification: P16, O11, H11

Keywords

• Economic Freedom
• Good governance
• Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
• MENA Region

References

Ayal, E. B. and Karras, G. (1998). Components of economic freedom and growth: An empirical study. Journal of Developing Areas, 32(3); 327-338.

Berggren, N. (2003). The benefits of economic freedom: A survey. The Independent Review, 8(2); 193-211.

Berggren, N. and Jordahl, H. (2005). Does free trade really reduce growth? Further testing using the economic freedom index. Public Choice, 122(1); 99-114.

Carlsson, F. and Lundström, S. (2002). Economic freedom and growth: decomposing the effects. Public Choice, 112(3-4); 335-344.

Chirot, D. and Hall, Th. D. (1982). World-system theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1); 81-106.

Cohen, J. N. (2011). Is economic freedom strictly free market capitalism? A decompositional analysis of the economic freedom of the world index. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Availible at mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/33676/

Easterly, W. R. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Economic freedom report at the world. 2012. Availible at www.freetheworld.com.

Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. (2002). Economic freedom of the world: 2002 Annual Report. Vancouver, Economic Freedom Network.

Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. (2008). Economic freedom of the world: 2008 Annual Report. Vancouver, Economic Freedom Network.

Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. (2010). Economic freedom of the world: 2010 Annual Report. Vancouver, Economic Freedom Network.

Hettne, B. (1995). Development theory and the three worlds: Towards an international political economy of development. New York, John Wiley.

Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1); 1- 55.

J. Samimi, A. and Azarmand, H. (2005). The relationship between economic liberalization and macroeconomic performance in World (1980-2001). Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 37(10); 41-62. (In persian)

Jasbi, J. and Nafari, M. (2009). Designing a model of good governance based on the theory of open systems. Journal of Management Sciences in Iran, 4(16); 85-117. (In persian)

Justesen, M. K. (2008). The effect of economic freedom on growth revisited: New evidence on causality from a panel of countries 1970 - 1999. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3); 642-680.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Governance matters IV: Governance indicators for 1996– 2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3630, June 2005. Washington, DC.

Komijani, A. and Salatin, P. (2008). Impact of good governance on economic growth in selected countries, OPEC and OECD. Journal of Economic Modeling, 2(6); 1-24. (In persian)

Landman, T. (2003). Map-making and analysis of the main international initiatives on developing indicators on democracy and good governance. University of Essex: Human Rights Center.

Lateef, K. S. (1992). Comment on governance and development. by Beetninger, Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, Washington D.C, p. 295. World Bank,

http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/about.htm#approach

Sabagh Kermani, M. and Baskha, M. (2009). The role of good governance in improving the functioning of government expenditure, Case study: health and education sectors in Islamic Countries. Journal of Economic Research, 86(44); 109-130. (In persian)

Shirazi, F., Gholami, R. and An˜o´n Higo´n, D. (2009). The impact of information and communication technology (ICT), education and regulation on economic freedom in Islamic Middle Eastern countries. Information & Management, 46(8); 426–433.

WDI, (2011). World Development Indicators. Available at: http: //www.worldbank.org

WGI, (2011). Governance Matters, Worldwide Governance Indicators.