ارزیابی شهرستان های استان خراسان رضوی بر اساس شاخص های توسعه پایدار

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• آمنه زارع
• مسعود همایونی فر
• محمد جواد رزمی

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

https://doi.org/10.22067/erd.v22i10.44610

چکیده

چکیده
امروزه آگاهی از نقاط قوت و ضعف مناطق برای دست یابی به توسعه ی پایدار نوعی ضرورت جهت ارائه ی طرح ها و برنامه ها محسوب می شود. توسعه پایدار دارای ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، زیست محیطی و نهادی -کالبدی است که در هر بعد شاخص هایی به صورت منتخب با توجه به ادبیات توسعه پایدار و شاخص های ارائه شده توسط کمیسیون توسعه پایدار سازمان ملل متحد، در نظر گرفته شده است.
با توجه به اهمیت موضوع توسعه پایدار در سطح جهانی و نیز در سطح مناطق، هدف اصلی این مقاله، تعیین سطح توسعه یافتگی و اولویت بندی توسعه شهرستان های استان خراسان رضوی، بر اساس شاخص های توسعه پایدار است. برای دستیابی به اهداف مورد نظر این مقاله، از روش های تحلیل عاملی، شاخص ناموزونی موریس، امتیاز استاندارد شده و رگرسیون استفاده شده است.
یافته های این تحقیق بیانگر این است که بین شاخص های انتخابی توسعه پایدار در 27 شهرستان استان خراسان رضوی، تفاوت و نابرابری وجود دارد. در تمامی روش های مورد بررسی در این مطالعه، شهرستان های خوشاب، زاوه و تخت جلگه نیمه پایدار، و شهرستان های بجستان، گناباد و مشهد از توسعه متوسط و سایر شهرستان های استان از درجه توسعه پایین برخوردارند. اولویت مولفه های پیش بین توسعه پایدار نیز به ترتیب عبارتند از: عامل اجتماعی – زیستی، اقتصادی – اجتماعی، اقتصادی- نهادی، زیستی کالبدی، و زیستی اجتماعی – اقتصادی.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• تحلیل عاملی
• توسعه پایدار
• خراسان رضوی
• شاخص های توسعه پایدار

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Townships of Khorasan Razavi Based on Indicators of Sustainable Development

نویسندگان [English]

• Amene Zare
• Masoud Homayounifar
• Mohammad Javad Razmi

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Environmental fans believe that sustainable development depends on future needs to balance the objectives of social, economic and environmental development. Although these goals are contradictory in the short term, but will strengthen each other in the long term. Sustainable economic growth depends on a specific amount of resources, such as pollution absorption and resource regeneration. The responsible use of environmental resources makes the development of long-term stability is achieved. Sustainability is an extensive and complex, and not a deliberate action on the basis of an agent. The most important factors include: economic, environmental, social, physical and institutional. Sustainable development indicators means by which the measure the degree of development, as well as measure the success or failure of development programs. So is inevitable enjoying economic indicators, environmental, social, physical and institutional planning process and its implementation. National undesirable planning has revealed the extreme differences in geographical areas of infrastructure development in the country. The process of development is not the same in a province, such as the development of the province. Therefore it is necessary levels of stability in the period analyzed. Can provide solutions and policies upgrade sustainability by assessing the current situation. Therefore it is necessary levels of stability in the period analyzed. Can provide solutions and policies upgrade sustainability by assessing the current situation. The aim of this study is to prioritize the upgrade sustainable townships of Khorasan Razavi.
Theoretical frame work
World Commission on Environment and Development has identified the precise objectives and the broad for sustainable development. These include: continuous increase growth, change the quality of growth, essential needs for jobs, food, energy, water, and health, in a much stable population control, conservation of resources, technological change, considering both the environment and economics in decision-making; the transformation of international relations, partnership development. These postulates of sustainable development as well as the theoretical framework of the paper forms. The purpose of this paper is to determine indicators of sustainable development based on the sustainable development literature to prioritize the development of the townships of Khorasan Razavi province. The research hypothesis is: between the townships of Khorasan Razavi province, there are differences and inequalities in terms of sustainable development.
Methodology
To test the hypothesis, a number of variables were selected as indicators of economic, environmental, social, physical and institutional. Then, using software SPSS, and R factor analysis, was built index. Was obtained by Morris Inequality index, and standardized scores, status and rank townships. This type of applied research, and the research method is descriptive analysis. Location research, Khorasan Razavi province. Data for 27 townships in the province have been extracted from the 2011 population census statistics.
Results
Varimax rotation has been reduced by 60 index to 5 factors. A total of five factors covered 76.6% of the variance. Contribution (social - bio) 34.2 percent, share of (bio - socio-economic) 20.3 percent, share of (economic - institutional) 9.9 percent, contribution (social - bio) 7.8%, and contribution (bio-physical) 4.3 percent. Rank development of each township is determined based on the lowest rating standard. Townships with less points are the priority planning. Township development priority factor scores were calculated by using a regression model using the software SPSS. The five-factor model dependent and independent variables is Morris Inequality index. Beta coefficient regression model determines the priority factors. Social - biological factor first priority and environmental - social - economic factor priority is fifth.
Conclusion
Morris Inequality index showed except Mashhad and Gonabad, all of the townships had low development. But according to a standardized score, the townships of Khushab, Zaveh, and takhtjolgeh is semi -unstable. And the townships of Mashhad, Gonabab and Bajestan a metastable (developed); and other townships of development are low. By comparing the standardized score townships, hypothesis is confirmed and the most important factor for sustainable development, social - bio factor in the province.
are differences and inequalities among selection criteria of sustainable development at 27 city in Khorasan Razavi province. In all methods examined in this study, the cities of Khushab, Zaveh and takhtjolgeh were semi-stable, Bajestan, Gonabad and Mashhad were in medium level of development and the other cities had the low degree of development. The priority of predictor variables of sustainable development are as follows: social factors - biological, economic - social, economic, institutional, bio-physical, biological and socio - economic.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Factor analysis
• Sustainable development
• Khorasan Razavi
• sustainablity indicators

مراجع

Alshuwaikhat, M., Nkwenti, D. (2002). Developing Sustainable Cities in Arid Regions. Available at: www.elsevier.com/locate/cities.

Asayesh, H., Estelaji, a. r. (2003). Principles and methods for regional planning (models, methods and techniques), Tehran: Islamic Azad University Uni- Shahr- Rey. (In Persian)

Barton, H., Grant, M. and Guise, R. (2003). Shaping Neighbourhoods: A guid for Health, Sustainability and Vitally, Sponpress, London and New York.

Ciegis, R., Kliucininkas, L. and Ramanauskiene, J. (2011). Assessment of state and tendencies of sustainable development in Lithuania, Management of Environmental, 757-768.

Dirbaz, A., Dadgar, H. (2007). Take a look at Islam and Sustainable Development, Tehran: young Thought club. (In Persian)

Feizi, Z., Zirak, J. and Ahmadinejad, S. (2013). Evaluation and Ranking the cities of Kurdistan using quantitative indicators Morris. The first national conference on Architecture and sustainable urban spaces: holy city of Mashhad. (In Persian)

Hao, W., et al. (2006). Modeling Indicator Systems for Evaluating Environmental Sustainable Development Based on Factor Analysis, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Scienc, 997-1002.

Hekmatnia, H., Mousavi, M. N. (2005). Factor analysis and Combining indicators in determining the Factors affecting the human development in areas Iran, Journal of Geography and Development, 6. (In Persian)

Kalantari, Kh. (2008). Processing and analysis of data on socio-economic research, Tehran: culture Saba. (In Persian)

Maclaren, V. (1996). Urban Sustainability Report, Journal of the American Planning Association, 148-184.

Masoumi Eshkuri, S. H. (2000). Active City and management of sustainable urban development, Proceedings of the First Conference on Management of sustainable development in urban areas, University of Tabriz: Tabriz. (In Persian)

Mousa Kazemi Mohammadi, S. M., Shakuie, H. (1999). Evaluation of sustainable development in urban development: the city of Qom. Thesis Submitted for the degree of PHD, Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian)

Mousa Kazemi Mohammadi, S. M. (2001). Economic and social components of sustainable urban development: a case study in Qom, Proceedings of the conference on sustainable development management in urban areas, University of Tabriz: Tabriz. (In Persian)

Mohammadi, Ch., Feizi, Z. (2013). Determine the level of development of the cities of Kermanshah province using the index HDI. The first national conference on Architecture and sustainable urban spaces: holy city of Mashhad. (In Persian)

Partr, R., B. Evans, S. L. (2005). Cities in the developing world, Trans. Irandoust, K., Dehghan, M. and Ahmadi, M. Tehran: publications ShahrdaryHa and Dhyary country. (In Persian)

Phillis, Y., Grigoroudis, E. and Kouikoglou, V. (2011). Analysis Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries, Ecological Economics, 70, 542–553.

Rahimi, H. (2004). An Introduction to geoghraphy and sustainable development. Oghlidos publication: Mashhad. (In Persian)

Rahnama, M. R., Aqajani, H. (2012). Analysis of spatial inequalities in Khorasan Razavi province. Professor of human sciences- Planning and Spatial Logistics, 16, 1. (In Persian)

Razdasht, A. (2011). The Analysis of Sustainable Urban Development Indices in Small Towns (Case Study: Dehdasht), Thesis Submitted for the degree of Master the supervising of Dr.H.Yaghfoori, University of Sistan and Baluchestan. (In Persian)

Rosati, D. (1999). Managing Globalisation with Equity, in United Nations First Global Forum on Human Development: Newyork.

Saraye, M. H., Lotfi, s. and ebrahimi, S. (2010). Evaluation and assessment of sustainability Development of the city Stations of Babolsar. Journal of Research and urban planning, 1, 2. (In Persian)

Scipioni, A., Mazzi, A., Mason, M. and Manzardo, A. (2009). The Dashboard of Sustainability to measure the local urban sustainable development: The case study of Padua Municipality, Ecological indicators, 9, 364–380.

Sorkh Kamal, K., Biranvand zade, M. and Zanjirchi, S. M. (2011). Classification of the city of Khorasan Razavi province in terms of the components of cultural development. Specialized Journal of spatial planning, 1, 2. (In Persian)

Timberlak, L., Holmberg, J. (1991). Defending the Futur: A Guid to Sustainable Development: London.

United Nations. (2006). Trends in Sustainable Development: New York, United Nations, and Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

WCED. (1987). the Brundtland Report; Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Zarand, M. Hesari, M. And Nily sani, H. R. (2007). Ranking city of Khorasan In terms of level of development, a selection of statistical data, 18, 2, 43-55. (In Persian)

Zare, A., Homayounifar, M. and Razmi, M. j. (2014). Assessment and Ranking of Townships of Khorasan Razavi Based on Indicators of Urban Sustainable Development, Thesis Submitted for the degree of Master, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian)

Zellner, M., Theis, T., Karunanithi, A., Garmestani, A. and Cabezas, H. (2008). A New Framework for Urban Sustainability Assessment: Linking Complexity, Information and Policy. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32, 474-488.

Ziari, K. A., Jalalian, A. (2008). Compare cities of Fars province according to development indicators 1976-96, Geography and Development, 11, 77-96. (In Persian)

Ziari, K. A., Zanjirchi, S. M. and Sorkh Kamal, K. (2010). Evaluation and Ranking the degree of development of the cities of Khorasan, using TOPSIS, Research in Human Geography, 72, 17-30. (In Persian)

)