نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 فردوسی مشهد

2 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

عملکرد اقتصادی کشورها در طول زمان، تا حد زیادی به محیط سیاستی، نهادی و قانونی آنها وابسته است. همچنین امروزه توسعه صادرات صنعتی به عنوان یکی از بهترین هدف‌های توسعه اقتصادی کشورها شناخته می‌شود. این موضوع برای بسیاری از کشورهای در حال توسعه که اغلب صادرکننده مواداولیه هستند حائزاهمیت است. بنابراین شناخت عوامل تاثیرگذار بر صادرات صنعتی آنها ضروری می‌نماید. از اینرو مطالعه حاضر به روش داده‌های تابلویی ، به پژوهش در مورد تأثیر کیفیت نهادی بر صادرات محصولات صنعتی برای نمونه 14 کشوری از کشورهای منتخب در حال توسعه بین سال های 2002 تا 2012 می پردازد. در مقاله از میانگین شش شاخص حکمرانی خوب در دوره مورد بررسی به عنوان شاخص نهادی استفاده شده است. همچنین علاوه بر شاخص نهادی از دو متغیر تولید ناخالص داخلی و نرخ ارز واقعی کشورها به عنوان متغیرهای کنترل استفاده شده است. نتایج برآورد مدل این فرضیه را تایید می کند که بهبود کیفیت نهادی اثر مثبت بر عرضه صادرات محصولات صنعتی در کشورهای مورد مطالعه دارد. این مطالعه نشان می دهد که در این کشورها برای افزایش عرضه صادرات باید تلاش شود علاوه بر رفع موانع پولی چون نرخ ارز بر بهبود کیفیت نهادی توجه ویژه ای صورت گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study the influence value of Industrial export supply of institutional quality countries (case study In selected developing countries)

نویسندگان [English]

  • fatemeh khani 1
  • Mahmood Hoshmand 2

1 frdosi

2 Ferdowsi university of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

Economic performance over time, is largely dependent on environmental policy, institutional and legal countries. Also nowadays development Industrial exports is known as the one of the best goals of economic development. The issue for many developing countries are often exporter of raw materials is important. Therefore, understanding the factors influencing industrial exports are necessary.
Hence, this study using panel data to investigate the impact of institutional quality on the export of industrial products for 14 samples from selected developing countries, between the years 2002 and 2012. In the paper than the average six indicators of good governance in the period under review as institutional index is used. In addition to the institutional index of two variables, GDP and real exchange rate countries were used as control variables.
The results confirm this hypothesis that improvements in institutional quality has a positive effect on the supply of industrial products export to countries in the study. And this study shows that to increase export supply in the countries In addition to removing financial barriers such as exchange rate should try special attention made to improving institutional quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Quality of institutional
  • industrial exports
  • Panel Data
  • developing countries
Ashrafzade, H. & Mehregan, N. (2008). Panel data Econometric. University Of Tehran, Cooperation Research Institute.(In persian)
Anderson, J.E., & Marcouiller, D. (2001). Trade and security, I: Anarchy. NBER, Working Paper, 6223.
Anderson, J.E. (2005). Trade and Informal Institutions, in Handbook of international Trade: Economic and legal analysis of Laws and Institutions, edited by E. K. Choi and J. C. Hartigan. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 93-279.
Anderson, J.E, &. Marcouiller, D. (2006). Insecurity and the pattern of Trade: An Empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statics, 84(2), 1 - 36.
Araujo, L., Mion, G., & Ornelas, E. (2012). Institutions and Dynamic Export.available online in: personal.lse.ac.uk/ornelas/amo_lastversion.pdf.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Goswami, G. (2004). Exchange rate sensitivity of japans bilateral trade flows. Journal of Japan and the World Economy, 16, 1-15.
Bakhtazma, J. (2011). To prioritize CIS Markets for Iran Non-Oil Exports Due to the Obstacles Ahead, Case Study of Khorasan Razavi. master thesis, Ferdowsi University, mashhad.(In persian)
Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley and Sons.
Busse, M., Groning, S.(2011). The resource Curse revisited: governance and natural resources. Journal of Public Choice, 154, 1-20.
Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economical, 4(16), 386-405.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics,3, 1-44.
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133-162.
Esazadeh, C. & Ahmadzadeh, A. (2009). The effect of institutional factors on economic growth, with emphasis on governance institutions, Economic research, 40(13), 1-28.(In persian)
Francois, J., Manchin, M.(2013). Institutions, Infrastructure and Trade. Journal world Development, 46, 165-175.
Gani, A., & Prasad, B.C. (2006). Institutional quality and trade in Pacific Island Countries, Asia Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade. Working Paper Series.
Gujarati, D. (2006). Foundations of econometrics. Translation Hamid Abrishami. Tehran: Tehran University Press.(In persian)
Hsiao, Ch. (2006), Panel Data Analysis-Advantages and Challenges, Working Paper, Institute of Economic Policy Research (IEPR), University of Southern California.
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics.
Karbasi, A. & Akbarzadeh, H. (2011). Assess the impact of bank credit growth and real exchange rate on agricultural products. Agriculture and development, 19(73).(In persian)
Knack, S. (2006). Measuring corruption in eastern europe and central asia: a critique of the cross-country indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. WPS3968.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (2007). Boondoggles, rent-seeking, and political checks and balances: public investment under unaccountable governments. Review of Economics and Statistics, 3, 566-572.
Levin, A., and Lin, C. F.(2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties,University of California, San Diego, Discussion Paper No: 92-93.
Lio. M., & Liu. M. C. (2008). Governance and Agricultural Productivity: a Cross-National Analysis, Food policy,33, 504-512.
Maddala, G.S., & Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 61, 631-652.
Mauro, p. (1998). Corruption and the composition of Government Expenditure. Journal of public Economics, 69(4), 79 – 263.
Memedovic, O. (2009). The Impact of Institutions on Structural Change InManufacturing: The Case of International Trade Regime in Textiles and Clothing.Available onlinein:www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/.../WP252009_Ebook.pdf.
Mehrara, M. & Rezaee, A. (2010). The quality of institutions and the effects of trade liberalization in developing countries. Journal of Commerce.(In persian)
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rauch, J.E. (2002). Ethnic Chinese Networks in International Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 30 – 116.
Rickne, J. (2009). Oil Prices and Real Exchange Rate Volatility in Oil-Exporting Economies: The Role of Governance. IFN Working Paper, 810, 1 – 48.
Rodrik, D. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.
Sekkat, Kh., & Meon, P.G. (2004). Does the quality of institutions limit the MENA’s integration in the world economy?. Journal of The World Economy. 27(9), 145- 149.
Sekkat, Kh., & Meon, P.G. (2009). Institutional Quality and Trade:which Institutions? Which trade?. ULB Institutional Repository, 46(2), 227 – 240.
Shakeri, A. (2004). Determinants of non-oil exports of Iran. Journal of Economic Research of Iran, 21, 23-50.(In persian)
Shahamed, T. (2006). Factors affecting exchange rates and estimates of real exchange rate based on the model of international finance. master thesis, Ferdowsi University, mashhad.(In persian)
Taherifard, A. (2010). Currency role in the development of non-oil exports in Iran. Program and Budget, 89, 47-78.(In persian)
CAPTCHA Image