بررسی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر فضای کسب‌و‌کار در استان گلستان (با استفاده از روش تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP))

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• محسن محمدی خیاره ¹
• نسرین رستمی ²

¹ دانشگاه گنبد کاووس

² گنبد کاووس

https://doi.org/10.22067/erd.v26i17.74581

چکیده

 وجود فضای کسب‌وکار مناسب و نیاز به شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر فضای کسب­وکار به‌منظور بهبود روند تولید ملی و ایجاد ظرفیت­های اقتصادی جدید امری انکارناپذیر است. پژوهش حاضر باهدف اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر فضای کسب‌وکار در استان گلستان صورت گرفته است. به همین دلیل، یک پرسشنامه‌ در قالب مقایسات زوجی و روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) در اختیار اعضای نمونه قرار گرفت و از طریق نرم‌افزار تحلیل‌های سلسله مراتبی  Expert Choiceوزن هریک از معیارها به‌دست‌آمده است. همچنین روش پژوهش کیفی مورداستفاده در این مقاله، تحلیل محتوای کیفی است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که عوامل ملی و استانی ازجمله کاهش اندازه دولت، کاهش محدودیت‌های مربوط به مقررات جذب سرمایه‌ی خارجی و ضمانت اجرای قوانین و مقررات اولویت‌های اول تا سوم و دیگر عوامل نیز، اولویت‌‌های بعدی را به دست آورده‌اند. همچنین معیار سهولت در انجام فرآیند کسب‌و‌کار بیشترین اولویت را نسبت به حداقل سازی هزینه‌ها و سرعت در انجام فرآیند کسب‌و‌کار دارد. نتایج تحقیق می­تواند بر توجه و اقدام سریع برنامه‌ریزان و سیاست‌گذاران به اولویت‌های اساسی فضای کسب‌و‌کار در حوزه‌ ملی و استانی تأثیرگذار باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• فضای کسب‌و‌کار
• تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP)
• استان گلستان

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating and Prioritizing the Effective Factors on Business Environment in Golestan Province Using AHP Method

نویسندگان [English]

• Mohsen Mohammadi Khyareh ¹
• Nasrin rostami ²

¹ Gonbad-e Kavous

² Gonbade- Kavous

چکیده [English]

Introduction:
  The existence of an appropriate business environment and the need to identify the factors affecting the business environment to improve the national production process and create new economic capacity is undeniable. Therefore, the present study aims to prioritize factors affecting the business environment in Golestan province. The favorable business environment has a significant impact on the attraction of domestic and foreign investment, employment and GDP growth (Bakhteiari and Shayesteh, 2012). The unfavorable business environment in Iran compared to other countries reduces the possibility of the presence of investors and economic activists in the country, and this can ultimately create a huge gap between Iran and developing countries (Zali et al., 2015). Thus, paying attention to the business environment and removing environmental barriers is vital in Iran. Furthermore, due to geographical location, natural resources, and agriculture in Golestan province, as well as the ways of communication with the tourist from Mashhad, sports and the existence of ethnic and cultural diversity in the province, there is a vast business capacity in this area. In addition, unlike some Gulf States, Iran is stretched geographically and each region has certain requirements that should be considered in any credible evaluation.
Research background
In the case of Iran, there are only a few researches at the provincial level that study the factors that affect the business environment, including Midri et al. (2013), Gerivani and Ahmadi (2016), and Paaseban et al. (2015). The present study is the first one to prioritize effective factors on the business environment of Golestan province. In the same line, foreign researchers such as Klapper and Love (2011), using panel data in 92 countries, looked at the impact of business environment reforms on the entrance of new companies. In addition, Djankov et al. (2006), by examining the relationship between business regulations and economic growth in 135 developing countries, concluded that better-regulated countries had faster growth compare to disruptive regulations. Furthermore, Hanusch (2012) found that time and cost as factors affecting economic growth and considers the flow of investment necessary to improve the business environment.
Research method
The present study aims to prioritize factors affecting the business environment in Golestan province. For this reason, a questionnaire was submitted to a sample in the form of pairwise comparison and Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) method, and the weight of each of the criteria was obtained through the Expert Choice hierarchical analysis software. The AHP method is one of the most famous multi-purpose decision-making techniques first developed by Saaty in the 1980s. This model, which is one of the most important multi-criteria decision-making techniques, is used to decide on very complex issues (Saaty, 1980, Narasimhan and Vickery, 1988).  
Findings
The findings of this study showed that the national and provincial factors, including decreasing government size, reducing restrictions on foreign investment attraction regulations, enforcing laws and regulations, and the power of influence by the competent people for each specialty, are priorities of the first to fourth. Factors for decreasing exchange rate fluctuations and ease of access to financial resources ranked fifth and sixth among the factors. Classification in the cost minimization criterion, as well as the ability to predict the government's economic policies in the speed criterion in conducting the business process ranked seventh and eighth among all factors. Other factors have gotten the next priorities. The ease of doing business also has the highest priority over cost minimization and the speed of doing business processes. The results of the research can affect the immediate attention and promptness of planners and policymakers to the basic priorities of the business environment in the national and provincial areas. In addition, the results of this study will be effective in continuously monitoring the business environment of the province, comparing it with other provinces and national indicators, and determining medium and long-term goals for promoting business environment indicators.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• business environment
• Hierarchical Analysis Process (AHP)
• Golestan province

مراجع

[1] Ahmadpoor Dareiani, M., Davari, A., & Ramezanpoor Nargesi, GH. (2010). Business Enabling Environment The Need for Entrepreneurship Development in Iran, Journal of Improvement Management Studies, 68. (In persian)

[2] Amini, A. R. (2014). Assessment and Analysis of the Business Environment of Iran's Economy (2000-2014). Economic Magazine, 1 & 2, 27-60. (In persian)

[3] Bakhteiari, S., Shayesteh, A. (2012), The Effect of Improving Business Space on Economic Growth in Selected Countries with Emphasis on Iran, Economical science Quarterly, 6(19), 175-204. (In persian)

[4] Djankov, S. McLiesh, C. and Ramalho, R.M. (2006). Regulation and growth, Economics Letters,92(3): 395-401.

[5] Driemeier, M. H. and Pritchett, L. (2010). How Business Is Done and the Doing Business Indicators; The Investment Climate When Frims Have Climate Control, The World Bank, Research Working.

[6] Emami, K., Maleki, E. (2014). The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on employment in Iran, Journal of Economic Sciences, 8(26), 95-112. (In persian)

[7] Gerivani, F., Ahmadi Shadmehri, M, T. (2016). The status of four components of the business environment in North Khorasan province. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policy. 23. 74. PP 151-170 (In persian)

[8] Haji, Gh., Komigani, A., & Hazhbarkeiani, K. (2015). The Effect of Effective Factors on Government Size in Iranian Provinces, Quarterly Journal of Iranian Applied Economic Studies, 4(15), 55-80. (In persian)

[9] Hanusch, M. (2012). The doing business indicators, economic growth and regulatory reform. Policy Research Working Paper. Browser Download This Paper,1-19.

[10] Hasanzadeh, A. (2009). Credit system, business environment, constraints and challenges, monetary research and banking, 1(1), 79-102. (In persian)

[11] Hekmatifarid, S., Mohamadzadeh, Y., & Khazali, D. (2016). The Effect of ImprovingBusiness Space and Observing Intellectual Property Rights on Economic Growth in Medium-to-High Countries, Journal of Research, Economic Growth and Development Studies, 6(22), 119-130. (In persian)

[12] Hoseini, M., Fahimifar, F. (2011). The Role of Developing the Financial System andImproving the Business Environment on Economic Growth, Proceedings of the FourthConference on the Development of the Financing System in Iran, 670-687. (In persian)

[13] Iranian Chamber of Commerce, Industry, and Mines and Agriculture (Center for Statistical and Economic Information), "National Endeavor of the Business Environment of Iran", autumn 2017, (In Persian)

[14] Klapper, L & I. Love. (2011). The Impact of Business Environment Reforms on New Firm Registration. www.ssrn.com

[15] Kurttila, M ., M. Personen, J . Kangas and M. Kajanus. (2000). Utilzing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis – a hybrid method and its application to a forecast-certification case, Forecast Policy and Economics, 1, pp 41-52.

[16] Maasomzadeh, M., Torabzadeh, A. (2004). Ranking of Industrial Products by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Business Research Journal, 30, 69-84. (In persian)

[17] Markaz Malmiri, A. (2016). "Report on monitoring the implementation of business environment laws", Islamic Consultative Majlis Research Center (Office of Economic Studies), NO.15623.

[18] Midri, A., Ghodgani, A. (2008). Measuring and improving the business environment, Tehran: University Jihad, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran. (In persian)

[19] Midri, A., Nasiri Aghdam, A., & Mortazavifar, Z. (2013). Evaluation of barriers to doing business in the province Zanjan, Economic research, 48(3), 129-147. (In persian)

[20] Narasimhan, R. and S. K. Vickery. (1988). An Experimental Evaluation of Articulation of preferences in Multiple Criterion Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods, Decision Sciences, Vol 19, No 4, pp 880-888

[21] Paseban, M., Azar Kasab, A., & Ali Mohamadi Asl, E. (2014). A survey of the business environment East Azarbaijan Province and its promotion strategies, Productivity management, 8(29), 143-162. (In persian)

[22] Saaty, T. L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol 15, No 3, pp 234-281.

[23] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[24] Saaty, T. L. (1993). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: a 1993 overview, central European Journal of Operation Research and Economics, Vol 2, No 2, pp 119-137.

[25] Shahnazi, R., Dehghan Shabani, Z. (2011). Investigating the Impact of Business Space on Economic Growth in Selected Countries, Economic Research, 42, 161-186. (In persian)

[26] Statistics Center. (2015). Human Resources Report. Statistical Yearbook of GolestanProvince of Iran Statistical Center. (In persian)

[27] Taheri, A. (2005). Barriers to attracting foreign investment in Iran, two issues of law and politics, 7(14), 21-54. (In persian)

[28] Tari, F., Alavimanesh, M. (2011). Improve the business environment in the fifth development plan, Quarterly Research and Parliament, 67, 47-89. (In persian)

[29] Tavakoli, A., Sayah, M. (2010). The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on economic activities of the country, Quarterly Journal of Money and Economy, 4, 59-77. (In persian)

[30] The Law of the Sixth Five-Year Plan for the Development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Islamic Consultative Parliament, www.DASTOUR.IR.(In persian)

[31] Vaidvay, O.S. and S.Kumar. (2006). analytic hierarchy process: An Overview of Applications, European Journal f Operational Research, Vol 169, No 1, PP 14-36.

[32] Valipoor Pashah, M. (2013). Economic Growth, Development Policies, Employment Creation and Poverty Reduction, Quarterly Trends, 20(61&62), 195-230. (In persian)

[33] Wares, H., Parvandi, Y., & Ghasemi, R. (2012). Enhancing the business environment to achieve the economic outlook: Application based on topisation and entropy techniques, Business Management, 4(11), 121-138. (In persian)

[34] World Bank. (2005). World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate For Everyone, available at www.worldbank.org

[35] Yu, H.C., Z. Y. Lee and S.C. Chang. (2002). Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Evaluate Alternative Licensing Mechanisms, Inform. Manage, 43, pp 517-531.

[36] Zali, M., Yadollahi, J., & Razavi, M. (2015). “Evaluation of entrepreneurship indices in Iran based on Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Model (GEM Program Results in 2015)” , Global Entrepreneurship Monitor in Iran, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Office in Iran(In Persian)