نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد

2 دانشجوی دکترای اقتصاد شهری و منطقه‌ای دانشگاه یزد

چکیده

چکیده
در ادبیات اقتصاد شهری –که در ایران نیز سابقه چندانی ندارد- نشان داده شده که عملکرد شهرها به ساختار آن‌ها بستگی داشته و به عبارتی بین عملکرد شهر و ساختار آن رابطه معنی‌داری برقرار است. بر این اساس و با وجود چنین رابطه‌ای می‌توان عملکرد آینده شهرها را بر اساس تغییرات ساختاری آن‌ها پیش‌بینی نمود. ازاین‌رو، این پژوهش با هدف بررسی روند تغییرات ساختاری شهرهای ایران و نیز تمایزات منطقه‌ای نظام شهری و بر اساس جایگاه نخست شهری طراحی شده است. برای دستیابی به این هدف، از شاخص‌های نخست شهری، دو شهر، چهار شهر گینزبرگ، چهار شهر مهتا، موماو و الوصابی، تمرکز هرفیندال، عدم تمرکز هندرسون، آنتروپی و تسلط شهری موسوی استفاده شده و داد‌ه‌های این مطالعه از سرشماری سال‌‌های 1355 تا 1395 استخراج شده است. نتایج به دست آمده نشان می‌دهد که پدیده نخست شهری در نظام شهری ایران در همه این دوران وجود داشته و شاخص‌های نخست شهری در این سال‌ها، حرکت به سمت تعادل بیش‌تر در نظام شهری کشور را نشان می‌دهد. بااین‌وجود، میزان نخست شهری طی سال‌های موردبررسی کاهش داشته و روند کاهش در شاخص‌های موردبررسی، همسو با یکدیگر است. بااین‌وجود و با توجه به شواهد موجود، نتایج به دست آمده نشان‌دهنده ایجاد نخست شهرها در نظام شهری ایران به جای یک نخست شهر است. همچنین بر اساس نتایج این مطالعه، اکثریت شاخص‌های موردبررسی تا سال 1385 نشان می‌دهد بالاترین و پایین‌ترین میزان نخست شهری به ترتیب در استان‌های تهران و مازندران بوده و از این سال به بعد، استان قم به‌عنوان استان با بالاترین نخست شهری در نظام شهری ایران پدید آمده است. بر این اساس، می‌توان انتظار داشت که تغییر در ساختار نظام شهری ایران زمینه را برای تغییرات عملکردی آینده در آن‌ها فراهم نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Regional Differences in The Primate City Changes of Iran: 1976-2016

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Feizpour 1
  • fateme asayesh 2

1 Associated Professor at Department of Economics, Yazd University

2 PHD Student of Economics, Yazd University

چکیده [English]

 
1- INTRODUCTION
In the urban economics literature - which does not have much history in Iran - it has been shown that the performance of cities depends on their structure. In other words, there is a significant relationship between the performance of the city and its structure. Accordingly, despite such a relationship, the future performance of cities can be predicted based on their structural changes. Therefore, this study is designed to investigate the trend of structural changes in Iranian cities as well as the regional differences of the urban system and based on the first urban position.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Although there have been many studies examining primary urban indicators in each region, based on the research conducted in this study, a study examining primary urban indicators by city in all provinces of Iran for the period leading up to the 2016 census, have not been observed. This makes this study different from other studies in this field. Thus, this paper is innovative in comparison to previous studies in two respects. First, it used the nine primate city indicators individually to realize the primary cities of all cities in the country, as well as all cities in each province in the country, and compared them among them. In addition, the rank-size rule has been used to measure the balance or imbalance in population distribution. However, in previous studies, primary cities have been calculated only for cities across the country or in specific regions, and only a few of these indicators have been used, with no comparison between them. Second, the survey period in this study covers the year 2016, based on the most recent information available in the field. However, primate city surveys of cities across the country (to the knowledge of the researchers in this study) have not been conducted until the last census period.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
This study is designed to investigate the trend of structural changes in Iranian cities as well as the regional differences of the urban system and based on the first urban position. To achieve this goal, this paper have been used nine Primate City indexes Including primate city Index, Two City Index, Ginsberg Index, Mehta's Four City Index, Moomaw & Alwosabi Index, Herfindahl Concentration Index, Herfindahl Deconcentration Index, Entropy Index and Mousavi urban domination. The data of this study are extracted from the census in Iran of 1976 to 2016.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The results show that the primate city phenomenon in the urban system of Iran has existed throughout this period. Also, the primate city indicators in these years show the move towards more balance in the urban system of the country. However, the primate city rate has decreased during the studied years and the decreasing trend in the studied indicators is consistent with each other. However, according to the available evidence, the results show the creation of prime cities in the Iranian urban system instead of a prime city. Also, based on the results of this study, the majority of the studied indicators up to 2006 show that the highest and lowest urban prime rates were in Tehran and Mazandaran provinces. Qom province has the highest urban prime in the urban system of Iran since 2006. Accordingly, it can be expected that the change in the structure of Iran's urban system will provide the way for future functional changes in them.
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The status of primate cities in different regions is influenced by situational characteristics and urban location. The study of regional primate cities during the study period, using Mehta's Four City Index, showed that border regions and regions close to border points have shifted from a predominant primate city status to a desirable or minimal status. This is because the flow of domestic goods and services moves from larger centers to smaller centers, and as this flow passes through different regions to reach the center, its impact is felt in intermediate regions, causing the primate city phenomenon in some domestic states (especially those close to other regions from the center of domestic goods and services).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • urban system structure
  • primate city
  • regional distinctions
  • urbanization
  • urban hierarchy
References
Akbari, N., Asgari, A., & Farahmand, S. (2007). City size distribution in urban system of Iran. Journal of Sustainable Growth and Developent (The Economic Research), 6(4),83-104 [In Persian].
Anthony, R. M., & Crenshaw, E. M. (2014). City Size and Political Contention: The Role of Primate Cities in Democratization. International Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 7-33.
Barzegar, S., Sheikh Azami, A., Yarlou, R. (2018). Analysis and review the urban hierarchical pattern in Mazandaran urban system. Regional Planning8(30), 77-88 [In Persian].
Black, D., & Henderson, V. (2003). Urban evolution in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(4), 343-372.
Dobkins, L. H., & Ioannides, Y. M. (2001). Spatial interactions among US cities: 1900–1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31(6), 701-731.
Eaton, J., & Eckstein, Z. (1997). Cities and Growth: Theory and Evidence from France and Japonf, Regional and Urban Economics. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27, 443-474.
Gabaix, X., Ioannides, Yannis M. (2003). The Evolution of City Size Distributions. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. 4, 1-51.
Ghorbani, R., Alizadeh, H. & Karami, S. (2021). An Analysis of the Reasons for the Decline of the Position of Tabriz Metropolis in the Urban System of Iran and the Prediction of its Population and Position by 2031, Town & Country Planning, 13(1). 83-114 [In Persian].
Glaeser, E. L., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1995). Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117-143.
Henderson, J. V., & Wang, H. G. (2005). Aspects of the rural-urban transformation of countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 5, 23-42.
Henderson, J. V., & Wang, H. G. (2007). Urbanization and city growth: The role of institutions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 283-313.
Khosravi, M. R., Shams, M., & Zakerhaghighi, K. (2017). Comparative study of Rank-Size Rule and Urban Differential model in hierarchy of spatial distribution of people in human settlements with focus in small towns’ roles, Regional Planning, 7(28), 65-80 [In Persian].
Livarjani, P. D., & Azami, A. (2009). A survey of primacy city in Iran in 1385: Policies and territory, 27(9), 181-202 [In Persian].
Lotfi, S., & Babakhanzadeh, E. (2013). An investigation of urban hierarchy and primacy in Iran (A case study of Kermanshah province). Spatial Planning, 2(3), 51-74 [In Persian].
Moshfegh, M. (2016). A comparative study on policy experiences regarding to even distribution of urban population in selected Asian countries, 2(3), 1-29 [In Persian].
Nazariyan, A. (2002). Urban geography of Iran, Payam Noor university.
Nikpour, A. & Hasanalizadeh, M. (2020). Spatial analysis of urban systems in the north of the country during the years 1335 to 1395, Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 14(49). 869-889 [In Persian].
Rahnmaee, M., Manouchehri, A., & Ebarahim Poor, A. (2011). Evolution of Urban primacy and Regional Urban System of Azerbaijan (1335-1385). Town and Country Planning3(5), 5-31 [In Persian].
Taghvaie, M., & Mousavi, M. (2009). A criticism of urban primacy determination indices and offering a new index submission (with an analytic look at urban primacy indices in Iran). Geography and Environmental Studies, 25-34 [In Persian].
Taghvaie, M., & Saberi, H. A. M. I. D. (2010). An analysis of Iran urban systems during the period of 1335 (1956) to 1385 (2006). Journal of Urban-Regional Studies and Research2(5), 55-76 [In Persian].
Tahmasebi, S. (2018). City and Regional Space Organization, Zanjan management and planning organization, Publications of the planning and budget organization of the country [In Persian].
Zebardast, E. (2007). Examination of changes in urban primacy in Iran. Honar-ha-ye-Ziba. 29. 29-38 [In Persian].
Zheng, C., Yuan, J., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., & Shao, Q. (2020). From digital to sustainable: A scientometric review of smart city literature between 1990 and 2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-51.
CAPTCHA Image