خصوصی‌سازی در ایران؛ چالش‌های نوین اقتصادی و مالی منطقه‌ای با نظریه داده‌بنیاد (گراندد تئوری)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• مهدی پناهی ¹
• فرزانه حیدرپور ¹
• علی اسماعیل زاده مقری ¹
• امیررضا کیقبادی ²

¹ گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

² گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/erd.2022.70873.1053

چکیده

چکیده
اصل 44 قانون اساسی به لزوم پیاده­سازی خصوصی­سازی در ایران پرداخته است که مبین اهمیت بالای آن در اقتصاد کشور است؛ درحالی­که با سپری شدن بیش از 4 دهه از تدوین این قانون، نتایج پژوهش­های اخیر نشان می­دهد خصوصی­سازی در ایران پیشرفت بسیار کندی داشته و اجرای آن نیز تأثیر مثبتی در سودآوری بنگاه­های اقتصادی واگذار شده نداشته و در عوض، بدهی­ها و ریسک­های آن­ها افزایش یافته است. مطالعه در ابعاد گوناگون خصوصی­سازی، ازجمله موارد مالی و اقتصادی می­تواند زوایا و مؤلفه‌های اثرگذار در اجرای صحیح آن را روشن سازد. هدف تحقیق حاضر ارائه نقش مؤلفه‌های اقتصادی و مالی در خصوصی­سازی، در قالب مدلی به روش برخاسته از داده­ها (داده­بنیاد) -یک روش پژوهشی استقرایی و اکتشافی- است. ابتدا شناخت اولیه داده­ها به روش فراتحلیل اجرا شد و سپس روش داده­بنیاد، با انجام 14 مصاحبه در استان­های تهران، اصفهان و خوزستان به روش گلوله برفی به اشباع رسید. با توجه به گوناگونی منابع سعی شد مدلی جامع از عوامل اقتصادی و مالی اثرگذار ارائه شود. یافته­ها نشان داد عوامل علّی اقتصادی و مالی اصلی اثرگذار بر خصوصی­سازی عبارتند از: 1. علل اقتصادی شامل ساختار و محیط اقتصادی کشور، توان بخش خصوصی و فساد اقتصادی؛ 2. علل مالی شامل مسائل درون و برون­سازمانی شرکت­های دولتی، مشکلات موجود در محاسبات و برآوردها، عوامل انگیزشی و مقررات و استانداردهای موجود. شرایط بستر، شرایط مداخله­گر، راهبردها و پیامدها نیز بصورت مدلی یکپارچه ارائه شد و درنهایت کیفیت مدل با استفاده از روش دلفی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• : خصوصی‌سازی
• اصل 44 قانون اساسی
• فراتحلیل
• گراندد تئوری

عنوان مقاله [English]

Privatization in Iran; New Regional Economic and Financial Challenges with Data Foundation Theory (grounded theory)

نویسندگان [English]

• Mehdi Panahi ¹
• Farzaneh Heidarpoor ¹
• Ali Esamailzadeh mogry ¹
• Amirreza keyghobadi ²

¹ Department of Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
1- INTRODUCTION
     While more than 4 decades have passed since the drafting of this constitution, the results of recent research show that privatization in Iran has progressed very slowly and its implementation has not had a positive effect on the profitability of divested enterprises and instead, Debts and their risks have increased, and a study of various aspects of privatization, including financial and economic issues, can shed light on the angles and components influencing its proper implementation.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
      Article 44 of the Constitution deals with the need to implement privatization in Iran, which indicates its high importance in the country's economy, and according to it, the economic system of the Islamic Republic is based on three sectors: public, cooperative and private with regular and proper planning. Privatization is a means of improving the performance of economic activities by increasing the role of market forces. Privatization policy is a way to reduce the financial pressure of state-owned enterprises on government budgets and increase their efficiency, empower the private sector, increase competition through the transfer of ownership and management of state-owned enterprises to the non-governmental sector.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
       In the first phase of this study, preliminary data were collected using meta-analysis method. The result of reviewing the background of studies on privatization was that using previous studies, an appropriate understanding of the space and challenges of privatization that had previously been faced by researchers was obtained. This data led to a better and clearer view of the implementation of the data-based method and the design and promotion of interviews with elites. After performing the foundation data method, a model was obtained which was evaluated by Delphi method for further validation, the details and results of which are presented below. Archival data was not used to make the sources more reliable and traceable.
 

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

       The findings showed that the main economic and financial factors affecting privatization are: 1. Economic causes including the structure and economic environment of the country, the power of the private sector and economic corruption, and 2. Causal financial and accounting conditions including intra-organizational issues of companies, issues external organization of companies is the problems related to calculations and estimates and motivational factors that have made the implementation of privatization difficult due to the executive context and the cases of the mentioned interveners. At the same time, the abundance of expert opinions shows that the most important factor influencing the privatization process is economic factors.

CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS

      As the findings show, various factors affect the privatization and the quality of implementation of Article 44 of the Constitution, in fact, all of these cases, even in the most detailed part, can prevent privatization and move the economy forward and implement strategies. It can improve its speed and quality, which indicates the need for sensitivity of all elements of society, including the three forces and the people in removing these obstacles and paving the way for privatization in the country.
Reforming the country's economic structure, which is strongly influenced by the global oil situation, exchange rate fluctuations, lack of support for production and employment, and the dominance of quasi-private or so-called private sectors over other sectors is the first step in implementation of privatization. If the monopoly trend of the market continues in many cases, it will not be possible to escape from the dark and dusty atmosphere of rent and underground economy and the weakness of the private sector will increase day by day.
According to experts, the use of accounting information in decision-making in Iran has not yet become a culture. Privatization executives should be well-informed about financial and accounting issues, or at least benefit from the presence of capable accounting experts in their executive team. Reducing the cost of representation in companies, increasing transparency in financial reporting, access to complete and quality information, creating information symmetry, improving the internal control system, improving the corporate governance system, identifying risks, meeting the information needs of users, weakening the underground economy, reducing corruption and rent-seeking, efficient management, increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of economic and financial, increasing public trust, protecting the treasury and strengthening the financial and capital markets, the results of which are vital for economic prosperity and improving the business environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Privatization
• Article 44 of the Constitution
• Meta-synthesis
• Grounded Theory

مراجع

References

 Adamson, F., & Galloway, M. (2019). Education privatization in the United States: Increasing saturation and segregation. Education Policy Analysis Archives,27(129). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4857

Alipour, M. (2013). Has privatization of state-owned enterprises in Iran led to improved performance? International Journal of Commerce and Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 281-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCoMA-03-2012-0019

Amiri, Mojtaba; Shahrzad Nairi; Marjan Saffari and Fatemeh Delbari Ragheb. (2013). Explaining and Prioritizing Barriers to Privatization and Private Sector Participation in Sports Development, Sports Management, Volume 5; No. 4, 106- 83.

Azar, A. Lashgari, Z. Amraee, H. (2009). A Comparative Study of the Performance of Companies Transferred to the Private Sector during 2001-2006, Publications of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. (in Persian)

Bazargan, Abbas, (2012). An Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods and a Mix of Common Approaches in Behavioral Sciences, Nidar Publishing, Tehran. (in Persian)

Carnoy, M. & Marachi, R. (2020). Investing for “Impact” or Investing for Profit? Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved [date] from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/social-impact-bonds

Cheng, Jao-Hong; Chih-Ming Lee; Chih-Huei Tang. (2009). An Application of Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy AHP on Evaluating Wafer Supplier in Semiconductor Industry, wseas transactions on information science and applications, Vol 6, PP 756-767.

Danesh Jafari, Davood and Barghi Oskooi, Mohammad Mehdi. (2009). Investigating the effects of implementing the general policies of Article 44 on macroeconomic variables using the CGE model approach of Economic Research, 3 (3), 15-38. (in Persian)

Edwards M., Davies M., Edwards A. (2009). What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: A meta-synthesis of the literature, Patient education and counseling, 75(1): 37-52.

Enright. Caroline, (2020). Someone to Lien on: Privatization of Delinquent Property Tax    Liens and Tax Sale Surplus in Massachusetts, 61 B.C.L. Rev. 667, https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol61/iss2/

Estrin.s and Pelletier, A. (2018). Privatization in Developing Countries: What Are the Lessons of Recent Experience?  TheWorld Bank Research Observer, vol. 33, no 1. https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article-abstract/33/1/65/4951686 by guest on 02 August 2020

Ghanbari, Ali and Hashem Spanloo, Hashem. (2008). Obstacles and Problems of Implementing General Policies of Article 44 and Duties of Regulatory Institutions, Journal of Strategy, 14. (in Persian)

Hemmati, Mohammad; Marzieh Ardakanizadeh, and the victims of Fauzia. (2011). Prioritization of Privatization Barriers; Through the process of hierarchical analysis, Tehran, National Conference on Privatization. (in Persian)

Komijani, Akbar (2003). Assessing the performance of privacy in Iran, Tehran, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, pp. 33. (in Persian)

Latifi, Somayeh; Raheli, Hussein; Yadi, Hussein; Saadi, Heshmat. (2018). Identifying and explaining the implementation stages of conservation agriculture development in Iran with fuzzy Delphi approach, Iranian Biosystem Engineering, Article 11, Volume 49, Number 1, pp. 107-120. (in Persian)

Mehrani, Sasan and Eskandar, Hoda (2016). Explaining the Paradigm Modeling of Auditor-Owner Negotiations on Financial Reporting, Empirical Accounting Research, No. 22, pp. 143-169. (in Persian)

Nasiri, Morteza (2003). Some legal considerations regarding state-owned companies, parliament and research, Journal of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly of the tenth year, Special Issue of Justice and Law, No. 38, pp. 174-163 (in Persian).

 Nouri, A., Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2011). A model for using the theoretical method derived from data in educational research. Curriculum Studies, 6 (23), 35-8. (in Persian)

Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Voils, C. I. (2007). Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in nursing & health, 30(1), 99-111.

Sriyono, E. (2019). Privatization in Water Resources Management: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Physics. To cite this article: Edy Sriyono 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1175 012023

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques andProcedures For Developing Grounded Theory (2 Nd Ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Yaqubi, Mohammad. Seifi, Vahid. Sadeghi Shahedani, Mehdi (2021). Basic privatization strategy in Iran. Economic Strategy Quarterly, Volume 10, Number 2, Summer, pp. 215-250.

Eskandari, Fardad. Razmjui, Muharram.2019, Comparative studies of privatization and development of a suitable strategic model for Iran. Quarterly Journal of Business Research, No. 92, Fall, pp. 201-230.

Razzaqi, Ebrahim. (1997). The Effect of Privatization on Iran's Security and Social Stability. Political-Economic Information -, 116-115 (1376): 168-177.

Nwankwo, S., & Richards, C. (2001). Privatization, the myth of free market orthodoxy in sub-saharan Africa, The Intonation of public sector Management, 2, 21-25.