نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه علوم اجتماعی، واحد قوچان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قوچان، ایران

چکیده

افزایش بی‌سابقۀ میزان بیکاری بین دانش‌آموختگان دانشگاهی از یک‌سو و عدم توانایی دولت در استخدام آن‌ها از سوی دیگر، نشان‌دهندۀ این است که مقوله کارآفرینی باید به‌طورجدی موردتوجه قرار گیرد. بر این اساس، هدف تحقیق حاضر شناسایی وضعیت روحیه کارآفرینی در بین دانشجویان و بررسی رابطه انواع سرمایه (با تأکید بر سرمایه اجتماعی) بر روحیه کارآفرینی آنان است. این پژوهش به روش کمی انجام شده است. جامعۀ آماری آن، دانشجویان سه مقطع کارشناسی، کارشناسی ارشد و دکترای دانشگاه فردوسی و علوم پزشکی مشهد است که 442 نفر از آنان به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه محقق ساخته است که با استفاده از اعتبار محتوا و اعتبار سازه، تعیین اعتبار و با استفاده از همسانی درونی به روش آلفای کرونباخ تعیین پایایی شدند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که از بین انواع سرمایه، سرمایه فرهنگی (r=-0.219) و اقتصادی (r=0.159) رابطه معناداری با روحیه کارآفرینی دارند. همچنین از بین انواع سرمایه اجتماعی، سرمایه معطوف به روابط دوستی و خانوادگی رابطه معنادار مثبتی با روحیه کارآفرینی دارند؛ درحالی‌که رابطه سرمایه نهادی با روحیه کارآفرینی رابطه منفی است. این نتایج نشان می‌دهد که علاوه بر تقویت سرمایه اجتماعی، لازم است که دانشگاه‌ها در مدل‌های آموزشی خود، افراد شاغل در محیط واقعی را در بحث آموزش در دانشگاه درگیر نمایند. چراکه این نوع برنامه‌ها دانشجویان را در مسائل و چالش‌های تجربه شده به‌وسیله کارآفرینان در موقعیت واقعی زندگی درگیر می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Examining the relationship between social capital and entrepreneurial spirit (Case of study: students of Ferdowsi and Medical Sciences Universities of Mashhad)

نویسندگان [English]

  • maryam sadat afkhami mostafavi
  • masoud imanian Ardebili
  • mahnaz amirpour

Department of Social Sciences, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
1- INTRODUCTION
           Currently, our country, on the one hand, encounters an unprecedented increase in the unemployment rate of university graduates, and on the other hand, the inability of the government to employ them. Hence, our society requires individuals who can be effective entrepreneurs in creating job opportunities and self-employment through establishing new businesses. There are many factors involved in being an entrepreneur, and the social capital of an individual is one of these factors. The research conducted in the field of entrepreneurship shows that social networks influence identifying opportunities, entrepreneurial orientation, and professional decision-making to become an effective entrepreneur. Thus, the presence of an entrepreneur in the heart of society and the continuous identification of individuals' requirements and efforts to meet them have become an inevitable necessity. In addition to being active in society and identifying appropriate opportunities, having efficient knowledge and updated information as capital is another undeniable principle of success for entrepreneurs. This capital, as the experts and researchers have classified it, includes human, cultural, social, economic, etc. capitals, all of which in the form of an interwoven system are trying to make value-creation in addition to creating knowledge and information as a competitive advantage by operationalizing it to meet the needs of other people. For this reason, there is a multi-faceted relationship between entrepreneurship and the aforementioned capitals, in the meantime, the relationship between entrepreneurship and social capital has special importance, which is discussed in the present research.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The recognition of appropriate opportunity is known as one of the most important abilities of successful entrepreneurs. Gaglio and Katz believe that understanding the process of opportunity recognition is one of the fundamental questions in the field of entrepreneurship. This has led to considerable interest in why, when, and how some people are able to recognize opportunities while others are not.  Because opportunity recognition is the starting point of entrepreneurship, hence, to identify these opportunities, entrepreneurs can access this importance more than other people by using different factors and methods, one of these factors can be social capital and its dimensions which entrepreneurs can act by combining them in daily relationships to recognize entrepreneurial opportunities in business environments. Many other researchers paid attention to the importance of social networks in identifying opportunities and showed that entrepreneurs with larger social networks identify more opportunities. In general, individuals’ social capital can be searched in terms of the origin of its realization in fields such as the network of friendships, family relations, neighborhood, and finally their institutional affiliations. The spirit of entrepreneurship also shows itself in various aspects such as acceptance of uncertainty, risk-taking, creativity, seeking independence, seeking success, and internal control. Since, according to the reviewed sources, social capital is mostly exogenous and entrepreneurial spirit is endogenous, it can be expected that, in a theoretical analytical model, social capital along with economic capital and cultural capital as independent variables explain a significant amount of the entrepreneurial spirit scores variance of social agents under study.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The current research is considered to be an applied problem in terms of the field implementation model in the form of a survey and terms of the approach. The technique used to collect information is the survey. The statistical population includes the students of Ferdowsi and Medical Sciences Universities of Mashhad in all levels of education in 1400. The tool of data collection is a researcher-made questionnaire, which was used to measure the entrepreneurial spirit from the questionnaire of Paul Barrow, Robert Brown, and Asadullah Kurdanaij. In this questionnaire, variables of social capital and its types, cultural capital, economic capital, and entrepreneurial spirit have been measured. The collected data has been analyzed using SPSS and Amos statistical software. Cronbach's alpha statistic was used to check the reliability of the research tool. As well as, in order to ensure the validity of the data collection tool, in addition to relying on the maximum use of validated items, the opinions of judges have been used.
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The descriptive findings of the research showed that the students’ social and cultural capitals are medium, while their economic capital is low, and they have a relatively entrepreneurial spirit. In relation to the types of social capital, the descriptive results show that; the amount of family social capital of students is higher than in other dimensions.
The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient test in examining the relationship between various social, economic, and cultural capitals with the entrepreneurial spirit of students showed that; among the types of individual capital of students, only economic capital has a significant positive relationship with their entrepreneurial spirit, while the relationship between cultural capital of students and their entrepreneurial spirit is negative, and there is no significant relationship between social capital and entrepreneurial spirit of students. Among the types of social capital, three types of social capital, i.e., friendship social capital, family social capital, and institutional social capital have a significant relationship with students' entrepreneurial spirit.
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The entrepreneurial spirit of students of Ferdowsi University of Medical Sciences is medium, which indicates that the social environment of students is not completely supportive in the field of entrepreneurship. Their social interactions are mainly with family, friends, other students, and lecturers, not with entrepreneurs, although the optimal conditions for entrepreneurship described in previous studies (which showed that the formation of the intention to start a new job increases in the case of support from close individual, the existence of an attitude of appreciation from the community and the confidence of working individual in the field of work) does not match.
It is necessary that participants in professional education develop an educational model that involves working people in the discussion of education in the university, which may include the use of guest speakers who are successful in the field of entrepreneurship. This form of the program brings benefits to students in the form of a unique experience. So that it involves them in the issues and challenges experienced by entrepreneurs in real-life situations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social capital
  • Cultural capital
  • Economic capital
  • Entrepreneurial spirit
References
Abbasi, N. (2015). Investigating the relationship between social and cultural capital and entrepreneurial spirit among Yasouj University students. Master,s thesis, Yasuj Univercity, Yasuj. (in Persian)
Afshar Kohan, J., & Naji Mehr, F. (2013). Investigating the effect of structural and cognitive dimensions of social capital on the sense of citizenship (a case study of Mashhad residents aged 18 and over). Urban Sociological Studies, 10, 1-16. (in Persian)
Ahmad pour Dariani, M., & Moghimi, S. (2018). Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship. Tehran: Farandish. (in Persian)
Ahmadi, E., & Alirezaei, M. (2019). Studying the effect of social capital on organizational entrepreneurship (case study: Naja headquarters support command. PoliceKnowledge Quarterly, 10(3). (in Persian)
Ahmadpour Dariani, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship (definitions, theories, models. Tehran: Jajermi.
Ajali, J., & Derhamjani, A. (2014). Examining the relationship between social capital and entrepreneurship. (in Persian)
Akhavan Mahdavi, M., & Mokhtari, M. (2017). Identification of entrepreneurial opportunities in social sciences and sociological explanation of factors affecting the exploitation of opportunities in Iran. Isfahan University Humanities Resaerch Journal, 29(3). (in Persian)
Akhavan Mahdavi, M.; Ahmadi, S., & Mokhtari, S. (2016). Identification of entrepreneurial opportunities in social sciences from the point of view of relevant experts and sociological explanation of factors influencing the exploitation of opportunities in Iran. tesis, Faculty Humanities, Social Science, Yasuj. (in Persian)
Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton, DL and Smilor, RW. New York: Ballinger.
Amin Beydokhti, A., & Sharifi, N. (2010). Examining the role of social capital in economic development: presenting a theoretical model. Yas Sterategy Magazine. (in Persian)
Asgharpour Masuleh, A. (2005). Measuring the amount of social capital of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences students. Master,s thesis, Dr Ali shariati Faculty Of Literature And Human Science, Mashhad. (in Persian)
Carsrud, A., & Brannback, M. (n.d.). Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind. New York.
Casson, M., & Glosta, M. (2007). Enternrurship and Social Capital: Analysing the impact of social network on Enterpreneural activity from a Rational Action Perspective. International Small beusiness Journal, 3, 220-224.
Colman, J. (1998). Absorptive capacity, anew perspecyive on learning and innovation. administrative science quarterly, 128-129.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of Social and Human Capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Buesiness Venturing, 3(18), 301-331.
Eliasi, A. (2010). The role of social networks in identifying entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Enterpereneurship Development. (in Persian)
Eskandari, S.; Mohammadi, S., & Moharamzade, M. (2012). The Relationship between Social Capital and Entrepreneurship in Exercising and Youth Administration of Ardebill Province. Archive of Applied Sciense Research, 4(5), 2105-2109.
Estrin, S.; Michiwicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2012). Entrepreneurship, social capital and institutions. Economic Working Paper, 115, 1-42.
Fathi, L.; Pourkasmaei, M., & Ebrahimi, M. (2018). Investigating the mediating role of progress motivation in the relationship between social capital and entrepreneurship. Research Journal of Social Work, 4(15). (in Persian)
Firkin, P. (2001). Entrepreneurial Capital: A Resource- Based Conceptualisation of the Entrepreneurial Process. Labour Market Dynamics Research Programme, 7, 1-27.
Gwan, S. (2010). Impacts of Social Capital on Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Development in the Knowledge Economy. George Mason University.
Hindel, K.; Klyver, K., & Jennings, D. (2009). An informed intent model: Incorporating human capital, social capital, and gender variables into the theoretical model of entrepreneurial intentions.
Hisrich, R.; Peters, M., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Boston: Mc Graw- Hill.
Hofested, G. (2005). Cultural Dimensions. New York: McGraw Hill.
Hornaday, J., & Bunker, C. (1970). The Nature of the Entrepreneur. Personnel Psychology, 23(1), 47-54.
Hoveyda, R.; Ghafouri, K., & Dolalit, A. (2017). Entrepreneurship, entrepreneur school, entrepreneur school requirements. The first national conference of enterpereneurial schools. Esfahan. (in Persian)
Ingram, A.; Hechavaria, D., & Matthews, C. (2014). Does cultural capital matter.
Jame Gehregi, M., & Migun Puri, M. (2020). The culture of academic entrepreneurship ecosystem, the driver of social entrepreneurship development. Journal of Cultureal Management, 14(51). (in Persian)
Karami, S., & Ali Beigi, A. (2012). Analysis of the impact of shared vision on the promotion of social capital in the development of agricultural entrepreneurship. Quarterly Magazine of Coopration and Agriculture. (in Persian)
Kavosi, E., & Kiasi, H. (2007). Examining the role of trust, norms and social networks in the development of entrepreneurship. Monthly Book of Social Science, 1, 95-107. (in Persian)
Lipset, S. (2000). (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship) Retrieved from SSRN.Com.
Masude, T. (2006). The determinants of latent entrepreneurship in Japan. Small Business Economic, 26, 227-240.
Mirzaei, H.; Mirzaei, M., & Katbi, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial potential and some social factors related to it (case study: Tabriz University). Journal of Social Science, Faculty of Litereture and Human Sciences, 14. (in Persian)
Nahapiet, J., & Choshal, S. (1998). Socail capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage. the Academy of management review, 23(2).
Poon, J.; Thai t, D., & Navbor, D. (2012). Social capital and female entreperenursip in rural region: evidence from Vietnam. Applied Geography, 35, 308-315.
Qolipour, R.; Madhoshi, M., & Jafarian, V. (2007). Analysis of the relationship and effect of social capital on organizational entrepreneurship (case study: Sadid Industrial Group). Management Culture, 6(17), 111-129. (in Persian)
Raynolds, P.; Storey, D., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28, 443-456.
Reynolds, P., & White, S. (1997). The Entrepreneurial Process: Economic Growth, Men, Women and Minorities. Westport CT: Qurom books.
Rastegar, A.; Akbarzadeh, M., & Hasapour Amiri, M. (2017). Explaining the effect of human capital and social capital on entrepreneurial intention by considering the moderating role of cognitive style (case study: University of Tehran). Iranian Social Development Study Journal, 10(2). (in Persian)
Shafaati, L. (2012). Study on Relationship between Social Capital and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(8), 7719-7726.
Sharepour, M. (2003). The origins of social capital. Management and Planning Organization, Mazandaran. (in Persian)
Sharapour, M., & Hosseini Rad, A. (2007). Examining the relationship between social capital and sports participation. Journal of Physical Education, 37(154). (in Persian)
Seyeddnoorani, M. & Vafaee Yegane, R (2009). Entrepreneurial culture. Cultural Engineering Mnthly, 5(45).
Zare, R., & Safari Dashtaki, M. (2018). Designing and explaining the paradigm model of social entrepreneurship with the approach of empowering women heads of households (case study: Imam Khomeini Relief Committee of Fars province). Journal OF Women in Development and Politics, 17(1). (in Persian)
Zarif Honarvar, A.; Feizi, M., & Ahmadi Shadmehri, M. (2020). Productive and non-productive entrepreneurship and its implications for economic growth. PhD thesis, Faculty of Administrative and Economic Sciences, Mashhad. (in Persian)
CAPTCHA Image